The Palin paradigm for GOP populism

From Frank Rich’s column in todays NYT:

…[Palin’s] test-marketed dishonesty has now become the template for her peers in the G.O.P. “populist” putsch.

…the party is exploiting the Tea Party movement to rebrand itself as un-Washington…

Pasted from <>

Sarah Palin seems to have struck a strong chord and offered the GOP a paradigm for reconfiguring itself and latching on to a resonant narrative, albeit through the vapid rhetoric of a particularly hollow populism.

The GOP has been in a desperate search for a new post McCain narrative, and it looks like the party is increasingly swaying toward the Palin example. Which would be both good for the Dems, but bad for the country. Bad, because besides besides further galvanizing of politics, tea-party dumbsense offers only empty talking points to address real problems (drill baby drill!); good for the Democrats though because there to my mind too many smart Republicans and centrists who will feel alienated, and who will splinter to some extent the Republicans in the long run as the party coalesces around the extreme right form of populism (Palin teabaggers) and the centrist form (McCain style). There is bound to be some sort of supple rift on the horizon as presidential election politics begin to loom closer.

This entry was posted in Interesting and unlabelled and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Palin paradigm for GOP populism

  1. auto quote says:

    The problem with this country is BOTH the Democrats and Republicans. Anyone who seriously thinks that one side isn’t corrupt or slaves to Corporate America hasn’t done an adequate job of paying attention. To the Republicans: The GW administration will go down in History as one of the worst administrations. They eroded your constitutional rights, expanded the power of the wealthy elite, invaded countries under false pretenses, destroyed diplomatic relations with the rest of the world, and spent money like it was going out of style. To the Democrats: Obama is a dud. He promised much and has turned out to be another corporate lackey. He made deals with big pharma to ensure you could not get your medication cheaper elsewhere, he flip flopped on military tribunals, he refuses to fix health care properly through nationalization or single payer, he populates his inner circle with more Wall Street insiders, he spends money on bailouts and useless stimulus packages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s